Cheap lens & pro camera, or cheap camera & pro lens?

Greetings everyone now years and years Ago when I was first learning Photography one of my favorite YouTube Videos about it was by digital revtv Where they pitted a pro camera with a Cheapo lens up against a cheap camera With a pro lens and I loved it it was Funny and informative helped me Understand the importance of good glass But that was 12 years ago now and a huge Amount has changed in camera technology What about today imagine with me for one Second that your uncle is driving a Mini Bus full of your elderly relatives and He falls asleep at the wheel and crashes Into a fireworks Factory tragedy but you Inhabit loads of money as a result Silver Lining but you have 17 brothers And sisters to share it all with and you End up with only three and a half Thousand dollars to kick start your Photography hobby with what combination Are you going to go for well here's your First option you could get a cheaper Camera here we have have the EOS R50 It's brand new and it's the most Affordable and small camera on the EOS R System and I've paired it up here with Canon's most expensive standard zoom Lens the 28 to 70 millimeter F2 this is The brightest aperture it's time to zoom Lens ever made and look at it it's just A monster look at these turrets like David and Goliath well if those two team

Together anyway I wonder how well that's Going to work up against your other Option Which is to buy a much more expensive Camera like my lovely Canon EOS R5 with Its 45 megapixel full frame Center and 8K video recording teamed up with the Cheapest zoom lens that I could possibly Find on eBay this thing costs 28 quid or 30 US Dollars and it's moments from Death it's a tan one lens from 1995 28 To 80 millimeter at 3.5 to 5.6 zoom lens I wonder how on Earth this can do up Against the cheaper camera with a pro Lens let's take a look Okay so this isn't the most serious Video I've ever made but I couldn't Resist putting it together at the same Time I was testing that new EOS R50 Camera and the ancient Tamron Lens was Calling out my name too and I thought to Myself I already use a load of the same Royalty-free music as an homage to those Old digital rev TV videos I might as Well steal some of their old ideas too When it comes to handling well this tiny Camera with a giant lens is a little bit Of a handful the back buttons are so Tiny and so touchy it's actually given My thumbs a bit of an egg to um to press The buttons and the front is so heavy That I dread to hold the camera as it is In case it just kind of snaps off really And I'm gonna get some funny looks

Holding this giant camera lens with a Small camera and this is one area where Actually I much prefer the more Expensive camera my URS R5 is much Bigger so that's helpful for my big Clumsy Farmer's hands it feels much more I don't know just much more dexterous And the small little lens makes the Whole system much lighter weight than a Cheap camera in the Pro lens so that's One nice little Advantage I suppose the More expensive camera Well one issue with the less expensive Cameras and it has a smaller clot sensor And that means you're not getting such Wide angles so there's 28 millimeter Lens so it doesn't really start with the Wide angular tool that's a bit of an Issue for my landscape photography so That's one advantage of the full frame Camera you can easily get wider angles And it's taken Canon a long time to make Wide-angle lenses for their aps-c sensor Cameras on that little EOS R50 at the Moment you'll have to adapt some older Ultra wide angle lenses like Canon's own EFS 10 to 18 millimeter is STM if you Want truly wide angles and who wants to Use an adapter right when working with a Full frame camera though you have a Bigger selection of wide angle Optics to Play with and the lenses focal lengths Are true to their numbers a 24 Millimeter lens really gives that 24

Millimeter angle and you don't have to Multiply it by the smaller camera's crop Factor of 1.6 times to figure out what Sort of field of view you're really Getting Now when it comes to autofocus both of These cameras are surprisingly easy to Use and nice and quick so the main Difference comes in the lens and when I'm using the uh yeah this lovely L lens It's lovely and snappy nice and quick And it's quiet and accurate I've got Nothing to worry about when it's Autofocus with a Canon L lens and it's a Little bit different with the old Tamron Then oh my goodness this thing is slow It's inaccurate and it keeps missing Although it does still at least work With the camera and also the autofocus Motor well it sounds a bit like an Asthmatic dinosaur in the mating season It's just grounding and wearing away There like like a team of Daleks and pain so I'm going to attract Maybe a little bit of attention if I try And shoot a wedding with a lens like This I'm so glad I don't have to review Lenses with autofocus Motors like that Anymore Okay well the most important thing most People will be asking is what about Image quality how does that compare well This little Leos R50 only has a 24

Megapixel little aps-c sensor so it Might not be the best camera in the World for low light photography but it's Still capturing quite a lot of detail Enough even for wedding shooting I think And the best thing of course is that With the lovely L Glass the pictures are Looking lovely and sharp even when You're shooting straight from F2 in fact The pictures look gorgeous the image Quality is looking wonderful That the same can't quite be said for The Tamron Lens with my EOS R5 now this Might have a 45 megapixel sensor so a Full frame so it's got loads of detail And it works really well in Darker Conditions but if you've got a soft lens And fun fit like this 28 year old Monstrosity then you're not really going To be able to do that much unless you Stop the aperture down all the way down To f8 or so and then you might get some Sharpness but it's actually quite sharp In the middle but the corner image Quality isn't all that isn't all that Good in my experience it's yeah looking A bit dark and there's also loads of Vignetting in the corners here Especially at F 3.5 the corners are Looking so dark and that's not going to Be a problem if you're using a crop Sensor camera like the R50 and a full Frame lens you're not going to get dark Corners at all even if you're not using

In-camera Corrections and in my Experience the Barker the quality of a Lenses blocker looks a little bit nicer On aps-c if you're using a full frame Camera because you don't get those weird Cat-size shapes to specular highlights In the image Corners so actually there Could be surprising benefits to using an Aps-c camera but with a decent lens The biggest advantage of an expensive Full-frame camera is shooting in low Light and at high ISO levels Well Normally here you can see that my Expensive EOS R5 camera's image is Producing a bit less noise at very high ISO levels a little less graininess but Despite its lower 24 megapixel Resolution the low budget EOS R50 camera Seems to be capturing almost as much Detail almost that's because the cheap Tamron Lens from 1995 on a more Expensive camera really isn't very sharp Compared to the expensive L lens Admittedly one nice Advantage at the Expensive EOS R5 camera is its fabulous 8K video capability perfect for tick Tock and other social media videos okay The 4K video quality of the Chiba EOS R50 camera is more than enough for Virtually everyone in the world but There's no denying as you can see here That with a lens attached that sharp Enough 8K video can be cropped into Beautifully giving you some nice editing

Options for more professional video work And despite the smaller camera having Only an aps-c sensor well the bright Actor of this lens means I'm getting Much more out of focus backgrounds the Pictures just look way way better having A decent piece of glass on top of them In all kinds of different ways I love the outer Focus backgrounds that A full-frame camera can offer but at the End of the day if you have a lens with a Lovely bright aperture less expensive Abs-c cameras can offer beautifully out Of Vegas backgrounds too it really is All about the lens here which is why I Love reviewing them so much At the end of the day having a fancy Full frame mirrorless camo which cost an Absolute Fortune while that can be Useful for certain photographers who Need 8K video of 45 megapixel images but I think it's much better I think Everyone knows this don't they it's much Better to invest in a good piece of Glass to put in front of it even a 24 Megapixel aps-c camera will get great Results if you're getting beautiful Images from a sharp lens with a bright Aperture

You May Also Like